Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Sport: The Australian Disease - sportingaustralia.com

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it

December 18th 2011 04:35
Grand final win over Central Coast
Brisbane Roar's superior system led them to a win over the Central Coast Mariners in last season's grand final. Photo: Geoff Auckland.



Now is not the time to panic for the Brisbane Roar.

Their record 36-game unbeaten run has given way to a losing streak that currently stands at four.

Thankfully, coach Ange Postecoglou is no Corporal Jones and is refusing to panic.

The key to Brisbane’s success in the last two seasons has been the system Postecoglou has created. It has made average players look good and good players look great. In other words, it has made the whole greater than the sum of the parts.

His system demands hard work, discipline, intelligence and teamwork – on and off the field.

During games, players are expected to create space, make runs and look for teammates. That means movement, movement, movement.

The philosophy is exemplified by the way defensive midfielder Erik Paartalu drops back to start attacks, fullbacks Ivan Franjic and Shane Stefanutto surge down the wings, midfielder Mitch Nichols buzzes around the hole and striker Besart Berisha darts between his markers.

And that’s just when Brisbane have the ball. When they don’t, the players quickly harry the opposition to win it back.

To learn and perfect the system required countless training sessions, because it meant unlearning old habits and painstakingly acquiring new ones.


Postecoglou deserves enormous credit for having had the foresight and courage to implement a system unique to Australian football.

He understood he had to go backwards before he could go forwards. That’s why he kicked out Brisbane’s core of recalcitrant veterans after replacing Frank Farina halfway through the 2009-10 season.

Few coaches would have had the nerve to dump Craig Moore, Danny Tiatto, Charlie Miller and Liam Reddy. Dumping the stars didn’t guarantee success; all it guaranteed was that the club would go backwards, at least in the short term, and put enormous pressure on Postecoglou. Coaching positions are difficult to attain yet he was prepared to risk his in pursuit of his vision.

The players that remained also deserve praise for being willing to open their minds and work hard, even when the results initially went against them.

Foresight and toil off the field produced scintillating and successful football on it. In just over a year, Postecoglou and co won the double, bagged a spot in the Asian Champions League and set an Australian professional sporting record that may never be broken.

All credit to the system.

Brisbane’s current losing streak doesn’t mean the system has broken. It is mainly due to some clever thinking from opposition coaches. It also owes something to Brisbane’s bad luck, loss of confidence and loss of form.

It would be tempting to say it was the Mariners that first made the Roar look fallible during several tough encounters late last season. However, that would only be half-right. They showed Brisbane were vulnerable against strong defending, thoughtful passing and incisive attacking – that is, quality football. But every team is. And no A-League side other than Brisbane is currently capable of playing that sort of football.

It was actually Gold Coast that really exposed Brisbane’s vulnerability – paradoxically, during a 3-0 loss in round three. To continue the paradox, Gold Coast coach Miron Bleiberg had the shrewdness to recognise that Brisbane’s irresistible attacking could be traced to the passing and movement of their defence. So to counter Roar’s attack from the back, he instructed his team to defend from the front.

Gold Coast pushed five strikers and midfielders forward to press Paartalu and the back four. Their energy and pressure made the Roar looked more vulnerable in possession than at any time during their unbeaten streak. But Brisbane’s composure proved telling. Recognising that they had an extra man in goalkeeper Michael Theoklitos, they were able to methodically – if riskily – pass their way out of trouble. Once Paartalu scored against the run of play in the 13th minute, confidence and energy drained from the Gold Coast, and the match was as good as over.

But where Bleiberg failed, Sydney FC coach Vitezslav Lavicka succeeded. He used the same pressing tactics to mastermind a 2-0 win and end the Roar’s unbeaten streak. Unlike Bleiberg, Lavicka had the luck go his way. Firstly, Dimitri Petratos’ goal in the opening minute gave Sydney confidence. Secondly, there was no Brisbane goal to drain their belief. Thirdly, the cool weather allowed them to keep pressing. Fourthly, the windy conditions affected the normally slick Roar passing.

Thanks to Bleiberg and Lavicka, A-League coaches now realise the way to beat Brisbane is to defend high up the pitch. They will pass and run you to death if given the chance; so better not to.

But that doesn’t mean Brisbane have suddenly become impotent. Even in their losses they have dominated possession. They still have an excellent system. It just needs refining.

Postecoglou made the first move. It took over a season for his rivals to respond. It is now Postecoglou’s move again. What he needs to do is not move away from his system but to further embrace it.

Enhanced pressure is making it harder and more time-consuming for Brisbane to play out of defence. However, long balls are not the answer. That will only lead to turnovers. Instead, Brisbane need to adopt even more short passing and running. Opposition teams can’t press high up the park without leaving space in midfield. So if Brisbane can eventually play their way into the middle of the park, they will find themselves with more openings than when teams parked the bus. Increased risks will produce increased rewards.

Brisbane may again have to go backwards to go forwards. If they continue trying to play out from the back in the face of ever increasing opposition pressure, they may go through a period during which they reguarly concede possession in dangerous areas, and subsequently cheap goals.

But the more they work on it – in training and during games – the better they will get at it. That will then spell even more danger for opposition teams than before, as they will have fewer defenders to combat Brisbane’s dynamic attack.

Don’t panic, Postecoglou. The system works and could make you the first coach to win consecutive A-League titles. That would be no more than you and your team deserve.
26
Vote
   


High-5ives not the answer

October 19th 2011 09:01
Australia v Bangladesh
Credit: Jen mainly in Bangladesh


Welcome to the world of 5ives.

This new concept has a sexy name for a good reason – it promotes itself as the saviour of the one-day international.

The aim is to make matches more interesting by keeping the teams in close contact throughout.

Team A would begin by batting for five overs. Team B would respond with 10. Team A would then bat for 10 overs, followed by Team B for 10, and so on. Bonus points would be awarded to teams that finished ahead during a cycle.

Cricket Australia is said to be interested in 5ives. The board is right to be interested, because the concept has the potential to make ODIs more interesting. However, 5ives is not the solution to the problem.

As Sport: The Australian Disease has already explained, there is a simple explanation for the declining popularity of the ODI.

The reason for the steady decline in the popularity of ODIs can be simply explained: they generally seem pointless. With an ever-increasing number of meaningless fixtures being played, it is natural that people would lose interest. But the way to win them back is not by emphasising gimmicks; the way to win them back is by emphasising cricket.

Although the idea of split innings is innovative, it is not gimmicky, so 5ives is based on sound thinking. That’s why Sport: The Australian Disease has already promoted split innings.

...splitting ODIs into two innings is a wonderful, and long overdue, idea. In day-night matches, the team that bats under lights is at a disadvantage, so this simple change would immediately make contests fairer and thus closer and thus more exciting.

It’s easy to see how playing matches in five-over bursts may produce problems. Batters and bowlers may struggle for rhythm. Innings may seem incoherent. Storylines may be difficult to follow.

But it’s also easy to see how five-over bursts may prove attractive. Matches may be more dramatic if teams are closer together. Constant changes may keep things fresh. Bonus points may introduce an intriguing new tactical element into the game.

Yet even if everything does go as planned, 5ives still doesn’t solve the problem of ODIs – that they generally seem pointless.

So often, cricket fans notice ODIs on the schedule and wonder why they are there. And they are right to ask that question, because many 50-over matches owe their existence to greed. They are not played for sporting reasons. They are played for financial reasons. Spectators know this and yawn accordingly.

Another reason fans have turned off ODIs is because they have increasingly emphasised cheap run-making.

Fans don’t only want to see close matches; they want to see matches in which there is an even contest between bat and ball. One hundred overs of slogging is mindless, even if it is somewhat redeemed by 10 tense overs at the end. By contrast, matches in which the advantage constantly ebbs and flows, in which first the bat, then the ball, then the bat and then the ball again is on top, produce drama from beginning to end.

Cricket Australia, the other boards and the ICC should be concerned about the flagging health of the ODI and be doing everything possible to revive it.

If the problem is that 50-over matches often seem pointless the solution can only be to return them to the relevant spectacle they once were.

Law changes, however wise, will only be bandaids. What is needed is major surgery – administrators need to urgently reduce the number of ODIs that are played.

First and foremost, CA should be campaigning to have the number of ODIs reduced. Fifty per cent of the matches could be cut from the international schedule and nobody would notice. This is nothing more than the commonest of common sense: reduce the supply of a product and demand increases.

The concept of 5ives fails to address this central issue. That’s why it may be part of the solution, but will never be the entire solution.
36
Vote
   


Get Kewell!

August 19th 2011 08:19
Harry Kewell
Will Harry Kewell play in the A-League or won’t he?

Australian football desperately needs the answer to be yes – which is why the FFA needs to do everything in its power to make it happen.

Having Kewell return home while he was still in something approaching his prime would be the best thing to ever happen to the A-League.

His impact would easily trump that of the two men regarded as the most successful marquee signings in A-League history – Dwight Yorke and Robbie Fowler.

That’s because his return would offer something for everyone – hardcore fans, casual followers and people who don’t care about the game.

The hardcore fans would delight in the chance to regularly watch one of this country’s finest ever footballers.

The casual followers would take greater interest in a competition featuring someone so talented.

Even the anti-football people would be curious to see how one of Australia’s most famous athletes got on.

This was a point Sport: The Australian Disease first made two-and-a-half years ago:

Although it is always heart-warming to see Socceroos returning to Australia, the only current international who would ever be able to put bums on seats is Harry Kewell. Even if Kewell joins the A-League several years past his prime – and, realistically, that is the only time we could expect to see him here – the fame he enjoys, the skill he possesses and the manner in which he plays would be enough to garner attention.

So it is up to the FFA to do everything possible to lure Kewell home.

The FFA did the right thing by investigating an innovative incentive-based deal, which would have limited the financial burden on the local game, while still giving Kewell the opportunity to cash in.

But the FFA has now apparently ruled out the offer proposed by Kewell’s manager Bernie Mandic, as it would have placed him in conflict with the A-League’s commercial partners.

If Mandic did suggest a contract that would have allowed Kewell to do deals with direct rivals to the A-League’s major sponsors, the FFA were right to reject it.

Major sponsors provide income that Australian football can’t do without, so they have to be treated like royalty. One-off exceptions can’t be allowed, because once a special agreement is reached with one player, others will demand the same.

However, if the FFA can’t be flexible in that area, they can be flexible in others. They may not be able to give Kewell the income he wants in one area, but that doesn’t meant they can’t help him get it in another.

The FFA won’t let Kewell do deals that threaten the A-League’s major sponsors. So why not chase acceptable deals on his behalf?

Kewell has demanded a certain percentage of the money raised from any extra ticket sales he inspires. The FFA has accepted this in principle – so why not offer to raise the percentage?

The FFA needs to be flexible and clever, because Kewell holds the upper hand – and he’s not ashamed to exploit it.

No one need take seriously the regular statements from Kewell and Mandic that the Socceroo star is devoted to Australian football.

If there’s one thing Kewell has proved in the last 15 years it is that Kewell is devoted solely to Kewell. His wallet can never be fat enough; his ego can never be stroked enough.

That’s why it never seemed credible he would be willing to return to Australia while he still had several good years left in him. But regular injuries have made him less attractive to good European clubs – and perhaps he also feels homesick.

So despite being only 32 and still in good form, he has seriously explored coming home. However, if he doesn’t get the money and pampering he thinks he deserves, he’ll head elsewhere. The Middle East is a serious possibility. Russia, apparently, is another option.

All reasonable steps must be taken to prevent that happening. The game’s powerbrokers shouldn’t be afraid to grovel. If they can make Kewell feel important enough, there’s a very good chance he’ll sign with Melbourne Victory or Sydney FC.

That would be the best thing ever to happen to the A-League.
45
Vote
   


Photo: Vagawi


The latest salary cap scandal to hit Australian sport is a reminder of the value of salary caps and the importance of enforcing them


[ Click here to read more ]
53
Vote
   


Michael Clarke
(Photo courtesy of Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-2.5)


This is an important time in Australian cricket


[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
   


Ian Thorpe
Can the sequel ever be as good as the original?

Ian Thorpe, Michael Klim, Libby Trickett and Geoff Huegill will soon find out


[ Click here to read more ]
87
Vote
   


Back to the future for Sydney FC

December 29th 2010 13:49
Sydney FC football club
Is Vitezslav Lavicka the new John Kosmina?

It seems an appropriate question given how much the Sydney FC of season six resembles the Sydney FC of season four – and how little the Sydney FC of season five


[ Click here to read more ]
96
Vote
   


Should they stay or should they go?

November 7th 2010 00:24
David Williams
Do North Queensland Fury belong in the A-League or not?

If the conspiracy theorists are to be believed, the FFA have already decided to dump the Fury, but are waiting until after the 2022 World Cup vote has been held to announce the decision


[ Click here to read more ]
141
Vote
   


Questions that need asking

September 11th 2010 07:08
“Want fans? Ask us how”.

Nothing better captures the A-League’s problem – and its solution – than that sign, famously displayed at a Gold Coast home match last year in response to owner Clive Palmer’s crowd cap
[ Click here to read more ]
208
Vote
   


How to fill cricket stadiums again

July 17th 2010 02:46
50-over cricket
News that Cricket Australia is planning to revolutionise the one-day format is exciting – but mostly concerning.

Several changes are going to be introduced in time for the coming domestic season, with a view to spreading them throughout the cricketing world. The aim is to arrest the declining popularity of the one-day international


[ Click here to read more ]
346
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
80 Posts dating from April 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Nick Bendel's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Nick Bendel
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]