Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Sport: The Australian Disease - sportingaustralia.com

“All animals are equal.”

This is the guiding principle on which the utopian community of Animal Farm is established. Or so its naïve inhabitants believe, until one day they are shocked to discover that the rule is subtly different. “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

Footy clubs share something in common with Animal Farm. We’ve all heard the stirring clichés spouted by players, coaches and administrators, extolling the virtues of their ‘band of brothers’, a ‘family’ in which everyone, from storied veteran to pimply rookie, is treated the same. After all, anybody who has watched even five minutes of sport in their life knows that ‘there’s no “I” in team’.


Yet when it comes time to enforce club rules, we often discover that some players are more equal than others. The storied veteran, it turns out, is usually judged less critically than the pimply rookie. The bloke with the great step or the quick hands has a tendency to get away with more than the anonymous journeyman or the perennial reserve. Various explanations will be given to elucidate the apparent inconsistency, but everybody knows the real reason: footy clubs place a greater value on premierships than principles.

That is why the decision by the Sydney Swans to put Barry Hall on indefinite suspension has come as such a shock. After his cantankerous display against Collingwood- which came just three games after returning from the ban he had incurred for assaulting Brent Staker- Big Bad Barry has been told to have a few deep and meaningfuls with psychologist Grant Brecht. By demonstrating that his key forward is as accountable as his less illustrious charges, coach Paul Roos has placed equality ahead of results. “Hopefully,” Roos said, “he can work through some issues with Grant and come back reasonably quickly, but when that is I don’t know.”




Andrew Demetriou, the AFL chief executive, praised the resolution. “I commend the Swans. I commend all clubs who feel it appropriate that, if they sign up to a set of standards at the beginning of the season with their leadership group, that they follow through with those actions…I think in the past what’s happened is that there have been agreed principles at the start of the season, but depending upon who the player is at the club sometimes those things haven't been followed through. You’ve got to congratulate the Swans. They are a club that does believe in keeping its word.”

While many observers will share Demetriou’s opinion, most coaches will probably take the Sir Humphrey view, deeming Roos’s decision to be not so much ethical as “courageous”. It’s all very well for a struggling club to take disciplinary action against important players- as Melbourne has just done with Aaron Davey, or as Fremantle did earlier in the season with Jeff Farmer and Heath Black- but is it not self-defeating when a genuine contender does so? Mick Malthouse actually admitted as much several years ago, when he confessed that for the good of the team, he treated some Collingwood players more equally than others. And, he added, somewhat unnecessarily, other coaches do it too.

Although he didn’t name names, Malthouse could easily have been talking about Denis Pagan. During North Melbourne’s glory years, he became adept at turning a blind eye to the many indiscretions committed by his star player, Wayne Carey. ‘The King’ could have done anything short of commit murder and he would still have played the following weekend. In return, Carey rewarded him with three grand final appearances and two flags.

Malthouse might also have been talking about the current West Coast boss, John Worsfold. Despite Ben Cousins’s repeated dalliances with booze, drugs and the underworld, Worsfold allowed his Brownlow Medallist to keep playing, appreciating that premierships are won not by the club with the best morals, but the best midfields. Only when Cousins was arrested for drug possession was he dumped, although not before he had repaid his coach with a couple of grand finals and a flag.

It will be interesting to see how this latest Barry Hall saga unfolds. Will Paul Roos keep to his word and only bring back the temperamental star once the psychologist has given him the all clear? Or will he succumb to the temptation of expediency, especially if his team continues losing, or suffering injuries? Over the next few weeks, we will discover just how equal the animals of the Sydney Swans are.
77
Vote
   


It is time to decide what sort of AFL we want.

Should we aspire towards the sort of laissez-faire system that Adam Smith might have advocated, in which “the invisible hand” of self-interest pits club against club, to ultimately produce the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of supporters?

Or should we aim for the Karl Marx model, of “each according to his ability, to each according to his need”?

Today’s AFL is a socialist utopia, in which the weak are propped up with salary cap dispensations, superior draft picks, and special grants. Had Brisbane and Sydney not been granted more salary cap room than their rivals, it is unlikely that they would have won their recent premierships. Had Hawthorn not received more favourable draft picks than their rivals (Buddy Franklin and Jarryd Roughhead were recruited at the end of the 2004 season, in which the Hawks finished second last), it is unlikely that they would have made such a rapid rise from the bottom to the top of the ladder. And had the Western Bulldogs not been allocated their Annual Special Distribution funds over the last few years, it is unlikely that they would even be alive.

Yet cracks have recently begun to appear in the grand socialist edifice. Salary cap dispensations have been wound back, while the priority draft pick system has been amended. Now, if Adelaide chairman Bill Sanders gets his wish, the ASD will be scrapped altogether. “A lot of people think it, no one’s saying it. I’d be surprised if Adelaide’s view was not shared by the majority of clubs.”

The Bulldogs- along with the two other struggling clubs, the Demons and Kangaroos- would surely be in Marx’s corner. They would argue that the socialist system needs to be maintained, to prevent those with rich heritages from dying, and to allow the sporting cycle to function as smoothly as possible. They would point out that eight different teams have played in the last eight grand finals, in which there were six different winners. More of the same would allow all 16 clubs a chance to taste success.

But the Crows- along with Sanders’ alleged silent majority- would surely be in Smith’s corner. They would argue that the socialist system needs to be changed, to prevent impediments being placed on future growth. They would point out that in such a competitive sporting marketplace, the last thing needed is an ideology that rewards mediocrity. More of the same would allow rivals such as football and the two rugby codes to make gains at the AFL’s expense.

The root of the AFL’s problem- and it is one with which football and the two rugby codes are familiar- is having to run a twenty first century competition with twentieth century structures. If the league was to be launched today, a collection of well-governed teams would be spread around the country, rather than the bulk of them hailing from Melbourne (and Geelong). Likewise, if the NRL was to be launched today, it would establish a truly national presence, instead of the current situation in which most of its teams are based in Sydney (and Newcastle).

Rugby union and football have recently tackled the same problem, with varying degrees of success. While the ARU has managed to place four viable provincial teams around Australia, its attempt to create a sustainable national club competition, the Australian Rugby Championship, failed. The FFA appears to have done a better job, replacing the National Soccer League- a competition with an uneven spread of poorly run clubs- with the A-League- a competition with an even spread of clubs, which appear to be more soundly managed.

As the AFL tries to modernise its aging structures, the ideological debate is heating up. New franchises will soon be opening for business at the Gold Coast and western Sydney, raising fears that two Melbourne clubs will have to be eliminated (or at least allowed to die a natural death) in order to make room for them. And that raises the question: what sort of AFL do we want?

An 18 team competition, run on socialist lines, would contain a blend of traditional and newer clubs, in which none are allowed to die, and all get to take turns at being successful. The risk is that in trying to please everyone, you end up with a bloated league, in which the talent is spread too thinly and mediocrity is rewarded.

It is difficult to predict what would happen if the competition was allowed to run on more capitalistic lines. There is little doubt that at least one Victorian club would fold, given that the market is just not big enough to support 10 of them. But it is also probable that at least one of the new franchises would go bankrupt, given that they would face stiff competition from their local rivals in both the AFL and NRL. Those with the most efficient and sustainable corporate models would survive, and they would be able to create stronger squads in what might be a competition of as few as 13 or 14 clubs. The risk is that in taking such a rationalist approach to improving the quality of the product, large numbers of fans are alienated, with the result that fewer people are interested in sampling it.

So what sort of AFL do we want? Will we trust everything to “the invisible hand”, and let the chips fall where they may? Or we will continue to muddle along with what we’ve already got, supporting “each according to his ability, to each according to his need”? As the ideological arguments rage back and forth, footy fans should be paying very close attention.
97
Vote
   


Voss on the fast track to failure

May 26th 2008 06:58
“Employee of the month named as McDonald’s new CEO!” screamed the extraordinary headline in The Australian. “Star train driver appointed to City Rail’s top job!” read the equally remarkable grab on the front page of the Sydney Morning Herald. “Michael Voss to become coach of the new Gold Coast club!” reported sport’s sections all across the country.

It is hard to know which is more illogical: the fact that inexperienced former athletes routinely get awarded head coaching positions, or the fact that very few people are shocked that it should happen. If a corporate organisation, such as McDonalds’s or City Rail, was to whimsically rush a neophyte into its boardroom, the cries of outrage and disbelief would be deafening. Yet when a club promotes a retired player to a position for which he is manifestly unqualified, nobody bats an eyelid.

Why, exactly, has the Gold Coast decided to make Michael Voss its inaugural coach? Yes, he was a champion player; yes, he occasionally provides interesting insights from the commentary box; yes, he has done some coaching courses; but what experience does he have, what meaningful qualifications does he possess? None and none, it turns out.

Voss has never worked as a head coach. Voss has never worked as an assistant coach. Logic suggests, therefore, that literally scores of people- that is, all current and former coaching staff- would have been more appropriate candidates. But that has not stopped the AFL’s next club from choosing him as its first boss. The only conclusion to be drawn is that Voss’s Brownlow Medal has been rated more highly than, say, Kevin Sheedy’s 27 years as a head coach, or John Longmire’s five and half years as an assistant. One can only wonder at the irrationality of it all.

As a legend of the game, Voss will initially receive more respect from the Gold Coast players than any unknown coach could have expected. He will only be able to exploit this for so long, though. Soon enough, his charges will be evaluating him not on his past deeds, but on how he conducts training, how he formulates game plans, how he responds during the heat of battle, and how he manages a large group of diverse personalities. And if they decide that he is not up to the job, their respect for him will inevitably diminish. Conversely, an anonymous appointee would win over the group if he was able to demonstrate that he knew what he was talking about.

Coaching an AFL club is a challenging and pressure-filled task, in which even the most illustrious have been known to fail. Denis Pagan’s unhappy five year stint at Carlton is a prime example. It stands to reason, then, that those with greater experience and qualifications are more likely to thrive than those without. In other words, it is possible that Voss will prove, from the very beginning, to be competent- just as Shelley the burger girl or Abdul the train driver might have risen to the challenge had those earlier headlines been true. Appointing a Sheedy or a Longmire, however, would have been a better guarantee of success.
101
Vote
   


State of Indifference

May 7th 2008 13:56
On Saturday night, the MCG will play host to the Hall of Fame Tribute Match, “the game 150 years in the making”.

Although there may be sound historical, emotional and commercial reasons for celebrating the sesquicentenary of Australian Rules football, an all-star game, between Victoria and the Dream Team (i.e. everyone else), is not the way to do it


[ Click here to read more ]
90
Vote
   


For the diligent scientist, not even six years of observance would provide enough time to allow conclusions to be drawn about particular phenomena. For the hack journalist, however, no more than six weeks are needed to be able to take stock of the Australian Football League.

Clearly, there is no better team to watch than Geelong. Besides boasting the competition’s most impressive list, their diversity of hairstyles is striking. Any outfit that can combine the defence of the endearingly-tousled Matthew Scarlett, the versatility of the impressively-bearded Max Rooke, the relentlessness of the extravagantly-locked Cameron Ling, and the end-to-end brilliance of the increasingly bald Gary Ablett, is going to be attractive


[ Click here to read more ]
99
Vote
   


Nick Bendel's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Nick Bendel
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]