Meet the new Lion King
September 3rd 2008 12:30
Rugby fans: imagine, if you will, the following scenario.
With the Tri Nations delicately poised, and with the Bledisloe Cup on the line, the Australian Rugby Union decides to take a gamble, dumping Robbie Deans and replacing him with Tim Horan for the upcoming test match against New Zealand.
Absurd though this hypothetical scenario is, it is worth considering why it is so absurd. Yes, it would be illogical to rush in a new coach on the eve of such a crucial match. But the greater illogic would lie in awarding- at any time- such an important post to a rookie, whose only merits would be that he was once a star and that he currently works as a commentator. Everybody knows that experienced players generally perform better in big games than inexperienced players. Well, the same applies for coaches. When the Wallabies take to the field for their most important challenge since last year’s World Cup quarter final, their supporters can be content in the knowledge that they are being guided not by a famous novice, but by a wizened tactician, who has spent many years learning, honing and practicing his craft. That counts for something.
Brisbane Lions fans: imagine, if you will, the following scenario.
With your club missing out on the finals for the fourth consecutive year, and with your list featuring a number of impressive youngsters who seem to have the ability to lead you forward, management decides to take a gamble, replacing your vastly experienced coach with a television commentator.
It may seem harsh to describe Michael Voss as a commentator, but that is what he is. He is no longer a player. And, notwithstanding a brief stint as the boss of the AIS’s under-17 team, he has never been a coach. He is simply a commentator. When reduced to such terms, it seems extraordinary that the Lions should have been in such a rush to hire him. Was Bruce McAvaney unavailable?
Sport: The Australian Disease made similar comments several months ago, when it appeared likely that Voss would agree terms with the Gold Coast franchise. Yet despite criticising the “irrationality” of his mooted appointment, Gold Coast’s behaviour was far more rational than is Brisbane’s. The new organisation offered him a three year deal: for the first two, he would have been coaching his team in the state league, before drawing on that experience when taking charge of the Coast’s inaugural AFL season in 2011. Brisbane, however, sees no merit even in such a limited apprenticeship; instead, the board is bestowing its most important position on somebody without the qualifications and experience to fill it.
Unlikely though it sounds, chairman Tony Kelly insisted that the entire board was “fine” with the appointment of a “novice coach”. True, Kelly acknowledged, Voss “hasn’t coached at the AFL senior level,” but then again, “everyone has to start somewhere.” While the new man “may make mistakes,” he and the others were determined to “back him all the way.” And thus the board handed Voss the keys to its Ferrari, simply requesting that he learn how to drive whilst speeding down the highway.
Given such irresponsibility, it seems appropriate to subject the board to some scrutiny. One might assume that it was filled by diehard fans or oft-concussed ex-players, who were so keen on the idea of their beloved Vossy returning to the club that they naively allowed his aura to affect their judgement. A quick examination of the Brisbane website, however, shows otherwise. Tony Kelly, the chairman, is also deputy chairman of the Brisbane Markets and a director of the Gladstone Ports Corporation. Angus Johnson, his deputy, serves as a managing director for Citimark Properties. As for the directors, Linda Nash is a senior member of the Queensland Treasury Corporation’s Major Projects Team, David Liddy is chief executive of the Bank of Queensland, and Paul Williams is a consultant who recently served as the CEO of Eastern Corporation. The final director, Laurie Serafini, is the only one of them to have played the game at the top level- yet even he holds a senior corporate position, acting as the head of sport: sales and marketing for the Slade Group.
How could such clever people have made such a manifestly illogical decision? The only explanation is that they, too, must have fallen under a spell- of Vossy in particular, and footy in general. If Liddy was looking to fill an upper-level vacancy at BQ, it is inconceivable that he would consider candidates who lacked a relevant degree and banking experience. That, after all, would be illogical. Yet in sport, different rules are allowed to apply. Business, with its sales volumes and balance sheets, must be rooted in logic, otherwise jobs are lost and companies ruined. However, sport, with its heroic competitors and screaming fans, is driven by emotion.
If Kelly et al owe their positions on Brisbane’s board to their corporate experience, then surely it is incumbent on them to apply the lessons they have learned in the corporate world when managing the club’s affairs? They could never have risen so high unless they possessed considerable intelligence and strong analytical skills. These intellectual gifts should have been exercised when it came time to selecting Leigh Matthews’s successor. For any old fool can make decisions based on passion- few, though, are as well placed as them to make decisions based on reason.
And that is the crux of the matter. Voss has become the new Lions coach not because he is qualified or experienced or the most accomplished, but simply because it warms the hearts of a few influential people. He is nothing more than a commentator with an aura. Granted, Michael Voss was a champion player. But as for Michael Voss the coach, it doesn’t take a Bruce McAvaney to realise that he’s nothing special.
With the Tri Nations delicately poised, and with the Bledisloe Cup on the line, the Australian Rugby Union decides to take a gamble, dumping Robbie Deans and replacing him with Tim Horan for the upcoming test match against New Zealand.
Absurd though this hypothetical scenario is, it is worth considering why it is so absurd. Yes, it would be illogical to rush in a new coach on the eve of such a crucial match. But the greater illogic would lie in awarding- at any time- such an important post to a rookie, whose only merits would be that he was once a star and that he currently works as a commentator. Everybody knows that experienced players generally perform better in big games than inexperienced players. Well, the same applies for coaches. When the Wallabies take to the field for their most important challenge since last year’s World Cup quarter final, their supporters can be content in the knowledge that they are being guided not by a famous novice, but by a wizened tactician, who has spent many years learning, honing and practicing his craft. That counts for something.
Brisbane Lions fans: imagine, if you will, the following scenario.
With your club missing out on the finals for the fourth consecutive year, and with your list featuring a number of impressive youngsters who seem to have the ability to lead you forward, management decides to take a gamble, replacing your vastly experienced coach with a television commentator.
It may seem harsh to describe Michael Voss as a commentator, but that is what he is. He is no longer a player. And, notwithstanding a brief stint as the boss of the AIS’s under-17 team, he has never been a coach. He is simply a commentator. When reduced to such terms, it seems extraordinary that the Lions should have been in such a rush to hire him. Was Bruce McAvaney unavailable?
Sport: The Australian Disease made similar comments several months ago, when it appeared likely that Voss would agree terms with the Gold Coast franchise. Yet despite criticising the “irrationality” of his mooted appointment, Gold Coast’s behaviour was far more rational than is Brisbane’s. The new organisation offered him a three year deal: for the first two, he would have been coaching his team in the state league, before drawing on that experience when taking charge of the Coast’s inaugural AFL season in 2011. Brisbane, however, sees no merit even in such a limited apprenticeship; instead, the board is bestowing its most important position on somebody without the qualifications and experience to fill it.
Unlikely though it sounds, chairman Tony Kelly insisted that the entire board was “fine” with the appointment of a “novice coach”. True, Kelly acknowledged, Voss “hasn’t coached at the AFL senior level,” but then again, “everyone has to start somewhere.” While the new man “may make mistakes,” he and the others were determined to “back him all the way.” And thus the board handed Voss the keys to its Ferrari, simply requesting that he learn how to drive whilst speeding down the highway.
Given such irresponsibility, it seems appropriate to subject the board to some scrutiny. One might assume that it was filled by diehard fans or oft-concussed ex-players, who were so keen on the idea of their beloved Vossy returning to the club that they naively allowed his aura to affect their judgement. A quick examination of the Brisbane website, however, shows otherwise. Tony Kelly, the chairman, is also deputy chairman of the Brisbane Markets and a director of the Gladstone Ports Corporation. Angus Johnson, his deputy, serves as a managing director for Citimark Properties. As for the directors, Linda Nash is a senior member of the Queensland Treasury Corporation’s Major Projects Team, David Liddy is chief executive of the Bank of Queensland, and Paul Williams is a consultant who recently served as the CEO of Eastern Corporation. The final director, Laurie Serafini, is the only one of them to have played the game at the top level- yet even he holds a senior corporate position, acting as the head of sport: sales and marketing for the Slade Group.
How could such clever people have made such a manifestly illogical decision? The only explanation is that they, too, must have fallen under a spell- of Vossy in particular, and footy in general. If Liddy was looking to fill an upper-level vacancy at BQ, it is inconceivable that he would consider candidates who lacked a relevant degree and banking experience. That, after all, would be illogical. Yet in sport, different rules are allowed to apply. Business, with its sales volumes and balance sheets, must be rooted in logic, otherwise jobs are lost and companies ruined. However, sport, with its heroic competitors and screaming fans, is driven by emotion.
If Kelly et al owe their positions on Brisbane’s board to their corporate experience, then surely it is incumbent on them to apply the lessons they have learned in the corporate world when managing the club’s affairs? They could never have risen so high unless they possessed considerable intelligence and strong analytical skills. These intellectual gifts should have been exercised when it came time to selecting Leigh Matthews’s successor. For any old fool can make decisions based on passion- few, though, are as well placed as them to make decisions based on reason.
And that is the crux of the matter. Voss has become the new Lions coach not because he is qualified or experienced or the most accomplished, but simply because it warms the hearts of a few influential people. He is nothing more than a commentator with an aura. Granted, Michael Voss was a champion player. But as for Michael Voss the coach, it doesn’t take a Bruce McAvaney to realise that he’s nothing special.
| 70 |
| Vote |

















Comments (4)
Add Comments