Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Sport: The Australian Disease - sportingaustralia.com

What’s in a name?

October 30th 2008 05:15
Football
“What’s in a name?” Juliet famously asked Romeo.

Although Ms Capulet would beg to differ, the answer, as far as embryonic sporting organisations are concerned, is plenty.

This is a nation obsessed with sport- indeed, some would call it the Australian disease- to the extent that the marketplace is overflowing with leagues and teams and players. Establishing a presence in such a competitive marketplace is thus extremely challenging, so it is a vital that any new club adopts an appealing name, one that differentiates itself from its competition and ties itself to its region. North Queensland FC would do well to take note.


For those who don’t know, NQFC has been granted permission to enter an expanded A-League next season, in conjunction with Gold Coast United FC. According to the chairman, Don Matheson, the club will soon announce its nickname, which has been taken from 300 suggestions provided by the public. Let us hope it is an inspired choice, because turning a profit will be no mean feat when one considers that the club is to be based in a small city (Townsville), part of a fledgling competition, and chasing money at a time when locals and businesses will be unwilling to part with it.

While a good name can’t make a business, it can go a long way to breaking one. With that in mind, it surely can’t be long before the South Dragons go bust. When the club took its place as Melbourne’s second NBL team in 2006, it decided, for reasons known only to the board, neither to differentiate itself from its competition nor to tie itself to its region. The first mistake was to create an unnecessary turf war with the St George Dragons, one of Australia’s most recognisable teams. The second- and even more foolish- mistake was not to let prospective fans know where it was from. Yes, the club is south- but south of what? Although the NBL is struggling for credibility, grassroots basketball is booming, which means that there are a great many casual followers who might, under certain circumstances, be persuaded to attend a game. However, if these very detached observers think that the Dragons are a rugby league team, or if they’re unsure where this South that they’ve heard a little bit about is from, what are the odds that they’ll make it to the Hisense Arena in time for tip-off?


Logically, the team ought to have called itself South Melbourne. It should also have picked a nickname that clearly identified it with its market- something along the lines of the South Melbourne Trams, only less absurd. That way, more people would know, and more people would care. In the three decades since the NBL was founded, 11 clubs have folded, including luminaries such as the Kings and Bullets, and respected Melbourne identities such as the Magic and Giants, indicating that there is a dangerous shortage of people who know and care about the league. History therefore suggests that for the South Dragons to establish a sustainable financial base, a very steep hill needs to be climbed. Adopting a sensible name would not have flattened the hill, but it would have made the slope gentler; by adopting a senseless name, it has only become more precipitous. North Queensland FC would do well to take note.

Yet NQFC should also note that if the NBL provides negative examples, it provides positive ones as well. As far as names are concerned, the Cairns Taipans and Townsville Crocodiles chose wisely. To begin with, everybody knows where they’re from. Moreover, they are represented by animals that are meaningful to the people of Queensland’s north, and which are not shared by other Australian clubs. In that basic way, when Cairns and Townsville joined the NBL, an instinctive bond would have been created between the two teams and their public. Much work would have remained (and still remains) to be done- but at least a step, however small, was taken in the right direction.

For more positive and negative examples, Matheson and company need only look at the competition they will soon be joining. The poorest judges of a name seem to reside across the Tasman. The defunct New Zealand Knights imprudently selected a nickname that had nothing to do with being a Kiwi, and which created an unnecessary turf war with the well-known Newcastle rugby league team. Another error was to ambitiously adopt the entire country as its heartland; instead, the club should have called itself Auckland, as the only way to ensure its survival was to seduce the locals. The Knights’ successor, the Wellington Phoenix, at least had the wisdom to tie itself to its home city, but it again fell into the trap of adopting a nickname that does nothing to appeal to the emotions of the target market. Something such as the Wellington Sheep would have been infinitely more logical.

If the poorest judges of a name are New Zealanders, the best appear to hail from New South Wales. The founders of the Central Coast realised that for their club to survive, Gosford would be too small an area to be limited to, and thus they prudently opted to align themselves with the region. Another moment of inspiration came when they decided to adopt the Mariners moniker; given that the history and culture of the Central Coast is bound up in the sea, ‘Mariners’ establishes an instinctive connection with the region, in the same way that ‘Phoenix’ fails to do with Wellington. Credit must also go to the brains behind Sydney FC. The nation’s biggest city is full of clubs, many of which have drawn inspiration from the wild (Tigers, Sharks, Bulldogs, Swans, Marlins, etc). Consequently, it would have been confusing to position the new outfit as yet another member of the sporting jungle. Rather, a distinctive and revealing name was adopted, one that immediately let locals know where the club was from, and which code is was playing.

When NQFC enters the A-League next year, the intensely competitive sporting marketplace and the depressed economic climate will make the already demanding task of starting a new business even more demanding. Success will be dependant on many things, but none will be more important than winning the hearts and minds of the people of North Queensland. Commonsense dictates that a Townsville Tigers or Northern Knights is going to inspire none but the most impressionable. Pick a clever name, though, and a lot more people will be receptive to the message that NQFC will be desperately trying to sell.
31
Vote
Shared on
   


Boomers
And so, like the Olyroos before them, the Boomers have been bounced out of Beijing.

But how different the circumstances. The Olyroos played meekly and unimaginatively, so that not only did they get what they deserved, they deprived themselves of any meaningful opportunity to progress to the knockout rounds. The Boomers, by contrast, played with spirit and thought, understanding that not only was it better to go down fighting, but that in fighting they were less likely to go down.

Not coincidentally, the difference in the way the two teams played reflected a difference in the way the two teams were coached. Graham Arnold instructed his footballers to be negative; Brian Goorjian instructed his basketballers to be positive. Playing conservatively does not suit the Australian mentality, or at least the Australian sporting mentality. Having a crack, though, does, which goes a long way to explaining the discrepancy in performances. How ironic that Goorjian, a native American, should have understood that better than Arnold, the man whose passion is so routinely praised, and whose heart is said to pump green and gold blood.

The Boomers were substandard in their opening fixtures against Croatia and Argentina. Although not conservative, the most telling aspect of their basketball was its tentativeness, which may be attributed to nerves. Their passing was hesitant; their shooting uncertain; their decision making muddled. In being tentative, they were committing one of the most deadly of the sporting sins, because it is astonishing how rapidly this sense of doubt can spread amongst a team, and how thoroughly it can permeate every aspect of its play. When you are tentative, you are neither one thing nor the other. At least the Olyroos knew what they were supposed to do- congregate in their own half and boot the ball away as soon as they got it. The Boomers, however, were schizophrenic; they didn’t know whether to play slow or fast, whether to act deliberately or impetuously, or whether to move the ball inside or outside.

But in the third game against Iran, something changed. Presumably, now that the Australians realised they were up against an inferior outfit, their confidence returned, so that their tentativeness vanished. The passing became crisp, the shooting confident and the decision making sharp, resulting in a 106-68 thrashing of the group’s whipping boys. That authoritativeness was then carried into the subsequent fixtures against Russia and Lithuania, which yielded stirring victories of a combined 46 points.



The way in which the Boomers challenged those two European powers, compared with the manner in which the Olyroos took on the footballing aristocrats of Argentina, is significant. Arnold was focussed on trying to limit the damage; Goorjian, however, was hellbent on winning. While Arnold was determined to lose as respectably as possible, Goorjian had a crack, appreciating that although it might result in a bigger defeat, it would at least provide a realistic chance of victory. Goorjian knew that to instruct his men to play conservatively would be to make them tentative, and that to make them tentative could only produce one result.

Goorjian took the traditional Aussie approach, and his charges responded. The Europeans found themselves assailed by aggressive drives to the basket, hard running, confident ball movement and relentless defending, of the kind that could never have been produced by the conservative ‘safety first’ tactics that Arnold had employed. For all their talent, the Russians and Lithuanians were unable to resist the onslaught. The Boomers earned the plaudits for their heart, but it was Goorjian’s brain that had been the key.

Deservedly, where Arnold’s team had departed at the group stage, Goorjian’s progressed to the knockout rounds. It is a measure of the respect the Australians had garnered that although their American opponents were heavily favoured to win, people spoke seriously of the possibility of an upset. And it is a measure of Goorjian’s mettle that the gameplan he devised was based not around limiting the damage, but overcoming the odds and pulling off a famous victory. To his credit- and to his players’ credit- the Boomers refused to cower before their mighty rivals. They attacked the Americans in the same way that they had harried the Europeans, even in the final minute, when the contest had long ago been decided. The Dream Team was forced to play hard for the entire 40 minutes in order to secure its 116-85 triumph.

To watch the Olyroos and Boomers get knocked out of the Olympics was to experience very different emotions. Graham Arnold’s team was eliminated because it was outthought, outplayed and outclassed. Brian Goorjian’s team, on the other hand, was merely outclassed. Where one left the fans with a feeling of frustration, the other made their supporters glow with pride. Australians don’t like to see their athletes vanquished, but if it is their fate to lose, let them at least lose like Aussies.
65
Vote
Shared on
   


The more one sees of Graham Arnold, the less there is to like. To the unhappy list of misguided tactics, poor management and thoughtless statements can now be added breathtakingly illogical selections.

Arnold, who serves as both an assistant to Socceroos’ coach Pim Verbeek and Olympic team boss, has just announced his 18 man squad for Beijing. Oddly, although he managed to find room for Nikita Rukavytsya and Billy Celeski, he could not accommodate the talented young duo of Bruce Djite and Nathan Burns, both of whom are full internationals. Further surprises came with the omission of David Williams and James Holland, who recently received their first senior caps. One might be tempted to believe that Arnie had lost his marbles, if not for the fact that he probably never had them in the first place.

A Graham Arnold-coached team does not make an attractive sight, either on the field or off it. His game plans are simplistic and one-dimensional; his commentary inarticulate, defensive and self-serving. If he doesn’t make players worse, nobody can accuse him of making them better. “He’s a number two [assistant coach],” a wise man once said, “not a number one [head coach].” That’s Arnie in a nutshell.

There are those who believe that the importance of a coach is overstated. A bad coach, they reason, will drag a team down, while a good coach will simply stand out of the way and let the players take charge of what happens out on the field. But when you look at some of Australia’s leading trainers, it becomes clear just how vital their role can be- and just how out of his depth Arnold is.

Brian Goorjian is the perfect example. Goorjian’s teams- whether at club or international level- have several things in common. They are cohesive, they are well-drilled- and they always defend well. Goorjian’s players also have several things in common: they are disciplined, they are astute- and they do exactly what they’re told. That is why Brian Goorjian is the most successful coach in NBL history.

Robbie Deans, Australia’s new rugby union boss, is another standout. Like Goorjian, he combines an ability to read the game with superb man management skills. During his time at Canterbury, the Crusaders were renowned not simply for playing successful rugby, or even attractive rugby, but innovative rugby. Sound ideas were communicated to the players, who were then carefully instructed on how to execute them. That is why Robbie Deans is the most successful coach in Super 12/14 history.

It is no coincidence that those basketballers and footballers lavish those two men with respect. Athletes might be binge-drinking, scandal-raising dolts, but if there’s one thing they have a gift for, it’s recognising a good leader when they see it. There’s a reason why the Goorjians and Deanss of this world win that respect, and the Arnies don’t.

Over the coming months, the Olyroos, Boomers and Wallabies will be playing a series of tough international matches, in which the difference between winning and losing might very well come down to the quality of the coaching. Cheer for them with all your might, but should the Olyroos turn out to be the least impressive of the three, don’t be surprised.
42
Vote
Shared on
   


Whither the NBL?

The extraordinary demise of the Sydney Kings, coupled with the continuing uncertainty surrounding the Brisbane Bullets, has shown just how shaky the league’s foundations are. If mere survival is a struggle for two of the biggest teams- which have collectively appeared in the last six grand finals, and won four of them- what chance do the rest of them have


[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
Shared on
   


Nick Bendel's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Nick Bendel
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]