Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Sport: The Australian Disease - sportingaustralia.com

Izzy serious?

June 1st 2010 11:24
The current Brisbane Bronco during his Melbourne Storm days
This is madness. Utter, utter madness.

How else to describe Western Sydney Football Club’s decision to recruit Israel Folau on over $1 million per season?


It is not madness when a 21-year-old signs a four-year contract worth millions of dollars to try to master a sport he has never played. That, in fact, is the epitome of sweet reason. But it is utter, utter madness when a club invests a fortune in such a person.

There are some athletes who deserve that sort of money to kick around a Sherrin – Gary Ablett, Chris Judd, Nick Riewoldt, Jonathan Brown. And there are some athletes who don’t – Kobe Bryant, Tiger Woods, Lionel Messi, Sachin Tendulkar. Keen observers will have noticed the difference between the two groups.

It must be noted that the decision, per se, was not flawed. If an athlete as talented – and marketable – as Folau was interested in crossing codes, it would have been illogical for an organisation like WSFC, which is desperate for success and publicity, not to have at least considered it. By all means, speak to him, gauge his intentions, subject him to some tests. Then, at the end of the process, if it looks as though he’s worth a gamble, discuss terms. But make him an offer commensurate with his Australian football experience – as opposed to, say, his record in rugby league, backyard cricket or tiddlywinks. In other words, aim low. That way, if the gamble fails – as is likely – little has been lost.


For it must be appreciated that this experiment is almost certain to end unhappily. To understand why, we need only look at the high profile NRL stars who switched to rugby union. Given that Lote Tuqiri, Wendell Sailor, Mat Rogers and Timana Tahu were all selected for the Wallabies, it can be said that their transitions were successful. However, with the benefit of hindsight, few would claim that they were so successful as to have deserved multi-million dollar contracts.

So if players moving from one code to a reasonably similar one would not have delivered enough value for that sort of money, what hope is there that somebody moving from one code to an entirely foreign one will prove worthy of such a large paycheque?

Further examples emphasise the point. Garrick Morgan may have been a union superstar, but he turned out to be depressingly average at league. Jeff Fenech may have been a great boxer, but he barely packed a punch during his brief stint with the Parramatta Eels. Michael Jordan may have been the greatest basketballer of all time, but he was not much of a baseballer.

Yet all this has been lost on WSFC’s chief executive, Dale Holmes. “Israel is a western Sydney boy and he’s someone who is going to play a great role for us,” he insisted, “not only as a player, but also in...bringing fans to our club. It was our administration’s view, and that of Kevin Sheedy as our senior coach, that an athlete of Israel’s height, skill, pace and power who wanted to come to our game was an exciting mix, and we want to give him the opportunity to succeed in our sport.”

Holmes’ reference to Sheedy raises an interesting point. Holmes, whose contribution to the game has almost exclusively been administrative, might perhaps be excused his foolishness. But how someone as experienced and astute as Sheedy could have been persuaded to embrace such a reckless throw of the dice is inexplicable.

It was only six months ago that Sport: The Australian Disease spoke out against WSFC’s pursuit of Jarryd Hayne.

Even if the Parramatta fullback could somehow be seduced, it is extremely unlikely that he would be able to turn himself into a star in a second code. And unless he could do that, the whole exercise would be pointless, because why would the [western Sydney] region be inspired by the exertions of a middling footballer?

The same article also highlighted the folly of short term thinking:

For WSFC to succeed, it will have to convince people that it’s committed to the region, and that it’s going to be around forever. In other words, it has to establish itself as a credible entity.

Cheap publicity stunts, therefore, are a hindrance rather than a help. Unquestionably, the Hayne story would have aroused the interest of the locals, many of whom would have devoted rare attention to a code that they’re ignorant of, and even hostile to. But one suspects that a majority of those would have regarded with scorn the idea of a league star wanting to convert to an entirely foreign sport, or making a success of it if he did. And that scorn would then, in turn, have been directed to the party responsible for the idea – WSFC. So increased recognition would have come at the price of decreased credibility.

This is where we are now at with Folau. The locals will have taken notice of the Bronco’s defection, and will be keen to see how he performs once his new team joins the AFL in 2012. So far, so good.

But when he fails to live up to his superstar billing, as he almost certainly will, these same people will lose interest in Folau and lose respect for his club, making the task of winning over the region even harder than it already is. Forget about the exorbitant contract – that’s one hell of a price to pay.
114
Vote
   


Storm warning

April 25th 2010 23:45
Melbourne Storm rugby league club
In one of the greatest crises to have hit Australian sport, the secret of the Melbourne Storm’s remarkable success has been exposed: cheating.

For the last five years, it had seemed as though a combination of astute development, inspirational leadership and a superior culture had allowed so much talent to be accumulated within the $4.1 million salary cap. Now, it turns out that the most important piece in the Storm’s once enviable puzzle has been creative accounting. Secret payments totalling $1.7 million have been made or promised, including a staggering $700,000 for this season.

Shocking though the whole thing is, it is really not so shocking. A sporting team getting caught rorting the salary cap is akin to Ben Johnson getting caught with anabolic steroids in his system. As Brian Waldron, the ex-Storm CEO who masterminded the fraud, was said to have reasoned: “Everybody does it.”

One would have to be naive to think that Johnson was the only doped sprinter in that 1988 Olympic final, just as one would have to be naive to think that Melbourne has been the only club to have committed any sort of financial irregularity between 2006 and 2010. Professional sport is a ruthless game, in which the win-at-all-costs mentality prevails. Some would have you believe that all 16 teams will be the richer for having competed for this year’s premiership. In fact, it will be a case of having one winner and 15 losers. That is the reality of professional sport. That is why some will find the siren song of cutting corners or acting deviously impossible to resist.

Philosophising aside, the NRL must be commended for acting so decisively. Johnson cheated to win his gold medal, so he could not have been allowed to keep it; the Storm cheated to win their spoils, so they could not be allowed to keep them. Even if everyone does it, such calculated and repeated dishonesty cannot be accepted. Chief executive David Gallop and his board had no other option.

While the pundits and punters have generally applauded Gallop’s move to strip the disgraced club of their ill-gotten premierships, minor premierships and prizemoney, there has been much condemnation of his decision to prohibit them from picking up any points this season. Complaining that it’s too harsh, undermines the integrity of the competition and betrays the fans, they have pleaded for this measure to be overturned.

These critics are right – but only partially. When deliberating on an appropriate penalty, the game’s powerbrokers would have considered two important points: how to punish the Storm and how to protect the fans. Dealing with past sins would have been straightforward – simply confiscate all winnings from 2006-9. But dealing with present sins – the Storm competing in this year’s premiership with a team that should never have been formed – must have resulted in considerable debate. Evidently, it was concluded that punishing those presents sins and protecting the fans were mutually exclusive options. Evidently, their critics share the same view.

Yet logic suggests that it would have been possible to achieve both aims. To begin with, the NRL was right to strip the Storm of all the points they had pocketed in the first six rounds, as these were won by fraudulent means. However, the league should not have deprived them of the opportunity to pick up points in the final 20 rounds. What should have been mandated was that as long as this team that should never have been formed remained in its present state, points could not be earned. Only when their squad was back under the salary cap could they have resumed doing so – but on one condition.

Simply getting everyone to accept a combined $700,000 pay cut would have been intolerable, because that would have meant permitting a team that should never have been formed to stay together. Rather, the NRL should have ordered the Storm to shed themselves of $700,000 worth of players at their official rates. So if Joe Bloggs was officially registered as a $500,000 player but had secretly been earning $700,000, somehow getting him off the books could have only been counted as a $500,000 saving. The Storm would then have been required to offload another $200,000 of talent – and the moment that happened, they could have again competed for points. They would therefore have had an incentive to speedily clean up their mess, which would in turn have minimised the damage done to the competition’s integrity and the hurt suffered by the fans. Had such a judgement been issued by the NRL, it would have simultaneously punished the guilty and protected the innocent.

Whatever the rights and wrongs of Gallop’s response, it will have been cheered by the Melbourne Rebels, Melbourne Victory, Melbourne Heart, Melbourne Tigers and Melbourne’s nine AFL clubs. For if rugby league is on its knees, as Sport: The Australian Disease recently argued, then rugby league in Melbourne is clearly in serious peril.

Since their foundation in 1998, the Storm have recorded an unbroken series of losses. Only through the largesse of their owner, News Limited, have they remained afloat – and News has promised to sell in the next few years. If they can’t turn a profit after making four consecutive grand finals (to go with their relatively recent premiership of 1999), how can they expect to get into the black when the sporting cycle turns against them?

We can expect to hear plenty of bad news coming out of Melbourne. Players will be forced to leave for salary cap reasons. Already, sponsors ME Bank, HostPlus and Skins have withdrawn their support. The club’s limited fan base will surely contract. In other words, it appears as though we’re about to see the beginnings of a vicious cycle, in which less talent means less success, less success means less corporate and public support, less support means reduced revenue, and reduced revenue means less money to buy talent. All these problems can be overcome, or at least ignored, when you have a rich owner. But what happens when the sugar daddy walks away?

News and the NRL have promised to stick by the Storm, but it is difficult to take these guarantees seriously. News is known for its ruthlessness, not its altruism, so once it finds a buyer, there is no reason to expect that it will take any interest in its former holding. Gallop’s goodwill can’t be doubted, but where is a CEO with limited financial reserves going to find the money to keep a loss-making organisation afloat?

This extraordinary saga does not spell the death of innocence in rugby league, because that happened a long, long time ago. Nor does it spell the death of the game itself, because Melbourne is not the heart of the empire, but a mere outpost. However, nobody should be surprised if it spells the end of the Storm. If creative accounting was the secret of their success, it may also turn out to be the reason for their demise.
144
Vote
   


The war of the World

December 20th 2009 02:31
FIFA World Cup
According to Andrew Demetriou and David Gallop, the AFL and NRL want nothing more than for Australia to win the right to host the 2018 or 2022 World Cup. According to Frank Lowy, the FFA is convinced that all the football codes would benefit from such an outcome. These men are lying.

Hence, we have a situation in which the FFA is trying desperately to prevail in an extraordinarily challenging fight, while its two main local competitors are trying desperately – if subtly – to ensure its defeat.

At first glance, the round ball game seems to be making a valid point when it says that Aussie Rules and league stand to gain from a successful Australian bid. After all, the federal government would pour money into the infrastructure that they rely on, such as stadiums, training facilities and transportation links. Therefore, Lowy and friends conclude, both codes can expect to make advances that they wouldn’t otherwise make, a point that Demetriou and Gallop calculatingly pretend to accept.

On closer inspection, however, football’s argument collapses, as Demetriou, Gallop and Lowy know full well. For while the AFL and NRL would make a gross gain from the World Cup, they would end up recording a net loss. That’s because although they would take a small step forward, their increasingly strong rival would take a giant leap, meaning that this absolute expansion would result in a relative contraction. In a sporting environment as competitive as Australia’s, it’s less important for governing bodies to increase their amount of pie than their share of pie. For the stronger party will always try to bully its weaker opponents, as evidenced by the AFL’s push into the rugby league heartland of western Sydney. Having dished out an incalculable number of beatings to football over the years, the AFL and NRL are terrified by the prospect of their former whipping boy growing strong enough to give them a taste of their own medicine.

The benefits football stands to gain from hosting the World Cup are colossal. When the Socceroos defeated Uruguay and subsequently advanced to the second round of the World Cup, it gave the code the greatest credibility it had ever experienced – a glow it continues to bask in several years on. Staging the tournament would trump that umpteen times over. With tens of thousands of fans joining some of the planet’s finest athletes in Australia, the excitement generated would be like nothing the nation had witnessed since the unprecedentedly heady days of the Sydney Olympics. Football would saturate the media; football would be on everyone’s lips. In short, it would be the most comprehensive publicity campaign any of this country’s sports had ever enjoyed. Having watched throbbing stadiums cheering on the likes of the Socceroos and Brazil, and having absorbed the monumental interest being shown by billions of people overseas, Aussie Rules and league would inevitably look less attractive by comparison.

That is why the AFL and NRL don’t want Australia to host the World Cup; that is why the FFA does. Most importantly, though, the punters – and thus the federal government – want it. As a result, Demetriou and Gallop have been forced to tread carefully, as they understand that it would be a PR disaster if they were thought to be impeding the bid, or harbouring negative feelings towards it. So, through gritted teeth, they trumpet the official line, proclaiming their support, while agreeing that it would benefit their codes too.

The recent outbreak of dissent from Demetriou and Gallop needs to be seen in this context. By issuing warnings to the FFA about stadium availability and crying foul about disruption to their 2018 or 2022 seasons, they have tested the waters to see how much rebelliousness will be tolerated. They have prodded the FFA, rather than thumped it, because open defiance would be considered unpatriotic. And the two appear to have gotten the balance right, with the general view being that they were not hysterically attacking the bid, but raising legitimate concerns.

Ironically, though, Demetriou and Gallop may have actually strengthened the FFA’s hand. For as Sport: The Australian Disease has previously argued, the only way to snare the World Cup will be to appeal to the emotions of the 24 members of FIFA’s Executive Committee. It won’t be done by telling people that we have the best infrastructure, because we don’t. However, a case can be made for awarding the tournament to Australia on the basis that it’s the only part of the world yet to be conquered by the global game. South Africa will be hosting the next World Cup for emotional reasons; if the FFA can convince FIFA that Australia is a ‘final frontier’ that needs to be snatched from other sports, it may end up doing the same in 2018 or 2022. So when the AFL and NRL attack football, they may unwittingly be attacking themselves.

Regardless, they need to realise that this is a battle they cannot win. The punters want the World Cup. The federal government – which has invested significant financial and political capital in the bid – wants the World Cup. No amount of petty quibbling from the AFL and NRL will be able to destroy that consensus. Consequently, there are only two courses of action for them to follow: praying for the FFA to fail, and preparing to cope in the event that it succeeds.

Should the World Cup come to Australia in around a decade’s time, it could very well prove to be a turning point in this country’s sporting history. Thanks to the years of favourable publicity football would receive either side of the tournament, it could be the moment in which the once derided ‘wogball’ – long identified as a sleeping giant – finally gained ascendancy over its two bigger rivals. And if that was to happen, it would be almost impossible for Aussie Rules and league to ever wrest back control. So disregard all the false smiles and soothing words from Demetriou, Gallop and Lowy. In reality, these three are locked in fierce combat.
97
Vote
   


Kevin Sheedy
First Kevin Sheedy, then Jarryd Hayne and now Paul Kelly: the AFL’s newest baby has only just been born, and already it’s made a significant impact.

When Sheedy was announced as the inaugural coach of the Western Sydney Football Club a fortnight ago, many in the harbour city took note. When it was reported that Hayne was on the team’s hitlist, further headlines were generated. And with word recently emerging that Kelly is considering taking up a developmental role, even more interest has been sparked. All this attention can only be a good thing, right


[ Click here to read more ]
121
Vote
   


Shamed!

May 16th 2009 04:09
Matthew Johns
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the incident, whatever may or may not have happened, the Matthew Johns scandal is a damning indictment of rugby league.

Four Corners is to be commended for exposing the shocking misogyny that lies at the heart of the game’s culture (and, incidentally, that of Aussie Rules too). It is a culture that objectifies women, transforming them from human beings worthy of respect into sexual playthings who may be used however footballers see fit. It is a shameful culture


[ Click here to read more ]
117
Vote
   


North Sydney Bears
The big issue to have dominated sporting circles recently has been expansion. There has been conjecture about which cities will play host to the A-League’s 11th and 12th clubs, discussion about where in Australia to locate a possible Super 15 franchise, grilling from a Senate committee over the AFL’s 18th team, and speculation that the Bears may be revived as the NRL’s 17th member.

Concurrently, an ideological debate has been simmering. Aside from the round ball game- which is the only one of the four footballing codes to boast a genuine national presence- arguments over what form this expansion should take have been occurring between those who might best be described as realists and visionaries. Should the safe option of branching out into friendly territory be chosen, as the realists maintain? Or are the visionaries right when they say that the only way to grow a sport is to establish a presence in a new market


[ Click here to read more ]
137
Vote
   


Should a booze ban be placed on NRL players?
It’s been said before, but it’s worth saying again. There are only three guarantees in life: death, taxes and footballers behaving badly.

After a sorry week in which rugby league suffered the latest in an incalculably long list of off-field incidents, Phil Gould repeated his proposal for all NRL players to be banned from drinking
[ Click here to read more ]
94
Vote
   


The ugly face of sport

December 8th 2008 10:34
Ricky Stuart
In the space of 24 hours, two utterly contrasting stories have appeared in the media, illustrating much of what is noble and ignoble and sport, and how it has the capacity to so fascinate.

The first was the decision by England’s cricketers to fly back into India, after their tour had been postponed in the wake of the Mumbai Massacre. This was as inspiring as it was surprising, because when the team left the country immediately following the terrorist attack, it seemed highly unlikely that it would return any time soon. In recent years, as bombs have exploded with dismaying regularity on the subcontinent, and security consultants have composed ominous reports, a mentality has taken hold amongst western cricketers. That mentality dictates that at the first sign of trouble, they either flee the danger zone, or adamantly refuse to enter it. It was this mentality that led to Australia refusing to play a test series in Pakistan earlier this year, as well as the refusal of Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa to participate in the Champions Trophy that was scheduled for September


[ Click here to read more ]
90
Vote
   


On its knees

October 15th 2008 14:55
Of late, a financial flu has started spreading around the world. It is highly contagious, capable of travelling rapidly, infecting indiscriminately and striking down even those who once seemed flushed with life. Such is the panic that individuals, families, corporations and governments have suddenly been confronted with their own mortality, and forced to ponder a dreadful question: will I survive?

Presumably, Australia’s major sports must also be giving serious thought to how they act in the face of this pandemic. All of them are exposed, although, as is the way with disease, the strong are less vulnerable than the weak. At times such as these, vitality is no longer about appearances, but a matter of cold, hard fact. Organisations that have been displaying an impressive façade, but are actually structurally unsound, are about to have their shaky foundations exposed. Tiger-like strength will be needed to fight this financial flu, which means that it is not enough to be a paper tiger. If it does nothing else, the global crisis will ruthlessly separate those sports that are weak from those that are strong. A reckoning is at hand


[ Click here to read more ]
77
Vote
   


Stalin
During the time of Stalin, it was the fate of many senior Bolsheviks to fall foul of the Great Father of the Soviet Union. Typically, these ex-leaders would not merely be tortured and executed, but also deleted from the historical record, as if they had never existed. Their images would be airbrushed from photographs, their portraits would be removed from government buildings, their deeds would be edited out of encyclopaedias, their names would be taken out of textbooks. They would become ‘unpersons’.

Tony Zappia, the chief executive of the Cronulla Sharks, seems to be a student of history, because Greg Bird has just begun to disappear from his club’s historical record. Although he has yet to be airbrushed from the team photo, and although he is still on the contract list, he is no longer to be found amongst the player profiles
[ Click here to read more ]
92
Vote
   


Sorry Money Bill- the cap fits

August 2nd 2008 02:53
In the week since Sonny Bill Williams’s defection, talk of salary caps has dominated the sports’ pages.

Are they fair? Are they effective? Are they legal


[ Click here to read more ]
83
Vote
   


It’s an extraordinary coincidence: whenever sportsmen are ‘mistreated’ and ‘forced out’ of their clubs, it is always to more successful, or more prestigious, or more generous rivals that they are ‘driven’. None of these people ever seem to wind up at weaker clubs, or with lesser deals.

So it is with Sonny Bill Williams. Having been ‘mistreated’ by Canterbury, he has now been ‘forced’ to explore his options in France’s domestic rugby competition. He will not be unaware that thanks to the combination of ambitious owners and a non-existent salary cap, teams in the Top 14 have never been paying higher salaries. According to reports, a young star like Williams, who is said to be on $450,000 a year with the Bulldogs, could earn more than triple that amount. Of course, no amount of money could ever make up for the suffering he has undoubtedly been subjected to by the Bulldogs- but hopefully all those Euros will go some way to easing the pain


[ Click here to read more ]
79
Vote
   


Nick Bendel's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Nick Bendel
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]