Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Sport: The Australian Disease - sportingaustralia.com

Los Pumas
If early indications are any guide, the Tri-Nations is to be expanded into a Four Nations tournament come 2012, when Argentina will finally be granted admission. This would be a welcome- and long overdue- move.

The Tri-Nations is amongst the leading events on Australia’s sporting calendar, yet one that could do with some tweaking. But to understand what is wrong with it- and to understand how the presence of the Pumas would be beneficial- we first need to understand what is right with the Tri-Nations.


The first point that needs to be noted is the evenness of the three teams, which ensures that matches are generally competitive and dramatic. Thrashings are rare; instead, spectators are more often than not treated to fierce battles that ebb and flow for the full 80 minutes, something that is promoted by the commendable bonus point rule.

And this process is further encouraged by the brevity of the competition. The Tri-Nations is not a marathon of the sort we see in the AFL and NRL, where losses can be accepted because there will always be more matches in the weeks ahead. No, it is such an intense sprint to the line that even one bad performance can mean the difference between winning the trophy and having nothing to show for months of sacrifice.

There is also pleasure to be derived from the diversity of the competitors’ approaches. The Wallabies play one way, the All Blacks another and the Springboks an altogether different way still. To watch these differing styles clash, and to see how their contrasting strengths and weaknesses come together, is fascinating.


Just as fascinating is the chance to observe the manner in which national teams emerge from the provincial sides each season. As the Super 14 season progresses, and as new stars and combinations blossom, debates about selections begin. Will that exciting youngster be blooded? Will that fading veteran be dumped? Will the balance of the team be affected by this or that decision? Although some of the questions are answered during the warm-up fixtures against the Europeans, nobody is ever certain how a XV is going to perform in the crunch matches until those crunch matches come around. The Tri-Nations acts as an unforgiving testing ground, clearly exposing the strengths and weaknesses of all who dare to take part. In such a highly pressured and combative environment, the true character of individuals and teams cannot help but be revealed.

For all these reasons, the annual tournament makes for compelling viewing. And, ironically, proof is provided not by decisive clashes of the sort that unfolded in Hamilton last weekend between the Blacks and Boks, but by dead rubbers like that involving Australia and South Africa in Brisbane the weekend before. Despite the fact that the home side had nothing to play for, the passion of the Wallabies and their supporters was immense. Nor was this anomalous- it happens every time there’s a dead rubber. Any competition that can generate such emotion over something apparently meaningless is obviously highly regarded by both competitors and spectators.

So if it ain’t broke, why fix it? Well, while nobody would suggest that the tournament is in danger of falling apart, it could certainly do with a fresh coat of paint. Sadly, there is a certain sameness about proceedings- which is unsurprising, given that only three countries are involved. For all the aforementioned virtues, they are rather predictable virtues. The players are generally familiar, the styles are generally familiar, the draw is generally familiar. In that respect, the Tri-Nations is not unlike a romantic comedy. However brilliant the script and the acting may be, it is obvious that boy is going to meet girl, boy is going to lose girl, and boy is ultimately going to win girl.

However, that will change with the admission of Argentina. Four competitors must inevitability provide more variety than three. Getting to know the new boys and their stadiums will be intriguing. Studying their European tactics will be intriguing. Examining the intricacies of the new scheduling will be intriguing. After so many years, the plot of future tournaments will be different.

Nonetheless, it should be acknowledged that not everything will immediately be for the better. While the Pumas are expected to be competitive at home, they will initially struggle on the road. And that struggle will be exacerbated if the Union Argentina de Rugby fails to secure access to its stars, all of whom are contracted to northern hemisphere clubs. Consequently- at least to begin with- there will be more blowouts and less drama.

But the odds are that this short term pain will be outweighed by the long term gains. For all the triumphalism of the International Rugby Board, there aren’t many non-traditional countries that are receptive to its message. Argentina is one of the few, which means that it is in the interests of the IRB to provide it with all possible assistance. If the Pumas are playing top quality rugby year after year after year, local interest and standards can only grow. And when the World Cup bronze medallists eventually raise themselves to the level of their three new friends, the southern hemisphere tournament will become a more open, and thus appealling, event. Concurrently, with the addition of one more member to the very exclusive group of teams capable of lifting the World Cup, that tournament will become more appealling too. The result will be a more appealling sport.

Of course, a more appealling sport is a more profitable sport. Increased interest in an expanded Four Nations will lead to increased revenues. Television companies will also be willing to pay extra for the new market being opened to them- namely, Argentina’s 40 million inhabitants. Hopefully, that will mean that the ARU no longer feels the need to embrace cheap stunts like the fourth Bledisloe.

Welcoming Argentina into its ranks seems such an obvious move for SANZAR to make that the only thing worth discussing is why it was not done sooner. Unfortunately, it seems to be another example of the group’s bizarre politicking, of the sort that has been occurring for some time over the new Super 15 franchise. Still, better late than never. And when, at some time in the years ahead, the Pumas celebrate their first Four Nations championship, the current SANZAR powerbrokers will be entitled to congratulate themselves on a decision that served the interests of southern hemisphere and world rugby.
83
Vote
   


Super 14
Following SANZAR’s decision to expand the Super 14, discussion has begun in Australia on where the new team should be located. This is premature.

For while the tripartite governing body resolved that the new team will play in the “Australian conference”, it deliberately refrained from taking the logical next step of agreeing that it will be an Australian team that plays in the Australian conference.

The Super 15, when it begins in 2011, is expected to become a 22 week competition. To begin with, each of the teams will play one another once, in keeping with the current system. They will then break into three conferences, with the five current New Zealand franchises participating in the New Zealand conference, the five current South African franchises participating in the South African conference, and the four current Australian franchises as well as the new franchise participating in the Australian conference. Again, each of the teams will play one another once. Then, the regular season will give way for a finals series that will probably incorporate six teams.

Common sense suggests that the newest Super member will have to be Australian. Besides finally giving all three countries equal representation, it would also be an acknowledgement of the bleedingly obvious fact that an Australian team is best placed to represent an Australian conference. And yet, at the recent meeting of the three partners in Dubai, no such agreement was entered into by the New Zealanders and South Africans, who believe that they have a strong case for playing host to the 15th franchise. Although this may seem strange, it is perfectly in keeping with the way that SANZAR plays its politics- namely, fiercely and wackily.

That explains why John O’Neill returned from the Middle East in a cautious and unassuming mood. “The thing I’ve really got to stress”, he explained, is that people shouldn’t assume “it is an ARU decision and it’s a done deal”. “That’s just not true. We have been saying consistently this is a SANZAR decision. SANZAR will decide where the additional team goes.” Yet while making sure to remain humble, the ARU chief executive did not lose the opportunity to apply a little subtle pressure to the South Africans, who loom as his chief rivals for the additional spot. “The only thing that has been agreed is that that team will play in the Australian conference. There is a reasonable presumption it should be in the vicinity. It doesn’t…make much sense for a team to be thousands of miles away and then playing in the Australian conference.”

If basing the 15th franchise in Australia is “a reasonable presumption”, the question of where in Australia it would be based is far more difficult. There is a quintet of contenders- Melbourne, western Sydney, the Gold Coast, Newcastle and Gosford- each of which boasts its own particular strengths, whilst being saddled with some obvious weaknesses.

The latter two are clear outsiders, given that both cities contain only about 300,000 people. Of these, Gosford appears to have the edge; while it is crying out for a sporting team to follow during the winter, its northern neighbour is already besotted with the Knights. The Gold Coast, though, looks like an even better candidate, albeit still an unlikely one. Home to over half a million people, the glitter strip is one of the fastest growing areas in Australia. However, securing sponsorship and support would be extremely difficult, considering that the city is already represented in the NRL and NBL, and has recently been granted entry into the AFL and A-League too.

That leaves the two heavyweights. If one was to focus on the positives, it would be said that western Sydney has a large population (1.85 million, making it the equal of Brisbane), a sizeable economy (the third largest in the country), an understanding of the game, and the almost certain guarantee of developing a compelling rivalry with the Waratahs. As for Melbourne, it has a larger population (3.8 million), a bigger economy, and a well-deserved reputation for being the sporting capital of Australia.

If one was to focus on the negatives, it would be said that the people of western Sydney have a clear preference for league over union, and that anybody who thinks otherwise would most likely have committed themselves to the Waratahs long ago. As for their southern cousins, it would be said that they have little affinity with the game, and that their hearts and wallets are already devoted to 14 AFL, NRL, NBL and A-League clubs.

The ARU is therefore confronted with an ideological dilemma in picking a winner between these two serious candidates. Does it choose the safe option of preaching to the converted, or does it take the risk of attempting to spread its message to the great mass of disinterested heathens? The former all but guarantees a return on investment; the latter holds out the prospect of substantially bigger returns, but at the risk of ruinous losses.

The history of sporting competitions trying to expand into unfriendly territory is a chequered one. Rugby league failed with the Western Reds and the Adelaide Rams, although with considerable nurturing it appears to have succeeded with the Melbourne Storm. The AFL came perilously close to losing both the Sydney Swans and Brisbane Lions, but can now claim that its enormous investment resulted in both clubs establishing themselves as fixtures. Financial concerns forced the NBL to cut the Singapore Slingers adrift after just two seasons, although O’Neill has vowed that the ARU will not allow the same thing to happen to the troubled Western Force.

What all this demonstrates is that for any competition hoping to sell its game to foreign markets, local interest will not reach sustainable levels without a substantial amount of time and money. That is the conclusion that the AFL has reached with its Western Sydney Football Club, and it is presumably one that the ARU has arrived at in regards to the proposed Melbourne franchise. If success is to be had in Victoria, it will certainly not come cheap.

These issues of time and money will be the key determinants not only of whether Melbourne receives the ARU’s endorsement, but also, assuming that it does, of whether the governing body is able to see the experiment through to a happy conclusion. Yet these are the two main areas in which it is lacking. The Australian Rugby Union of today is like the Soccer Australia of old- that is, a financially challenged organisation beset with politicking, whose obsession with deal making and number crunching and empire building encourages administrators to focus on the present. Melbourne could never hope to become a viable franchise unless the ARU was prepared to look far into the future and pump it with money. But what chance is there of that happening?

So when the ARU finds itself in a position to nominate the location of the 15th Super franchise, it needs to make sure that serious questions are asked. Should it turn out that sufficient foresight and unity and resources are capable of being mustered, expanding into Melbourne would be in the long-term interests of the game. If, on the other hand, it is to be business as usual at rugby headquarters, then the only realistic option is to award the prize to western Sydney. That is assuming, of course, that the newest Australian franchise doesn’t come out of Africa.
125
Vote
   


The Force is not with him

February 23rd 2009 05:53
John Mitchell
The moment Matt Giteau announced that he would be rejoining the ACT Brumbies next year, speculation began over the future of his current club, the Western Force.

The main point being made is this: why would anybody want to join the Force? They’re based on the other side of the country, they’re representatives of a largely apathetic city, they’re no longer directing bonus money to their players via Firepower, they’ve got a coach nobody seems to like, their foundations are weak- and now their linchpin is departing. Why would anybody want to join the Force?



For the sake of Australian rugby, it is to be hoped that Perth can again become the prime destination it was just a few years ago, when the Force launched an aggressive- and successful- recruitment drive for their inaugural Super 14 season. True, some things may be beyond their control: geography can’t be altered, traditions can’t be established overnight, and given the global financial crisis and strict ARU regulations, third party top-ups can’t be counted on. However, some things are definitely within the club’s control. Through clever marketing and relentless community work, they can build their profile and increase their standing in the eyes of the city. Through canny management and rigorous planning, they can ensure that their commercial and sporting structures are sound enough to impress potential new recruits. Most crucially, they can bring in a coach who is going to attract- rather than repel- players.

When John Mitchell was installed as the club’s first coach, he quickly proved to be a major asset. Having been both a captain and coach of the All Blacks, he was able to give the incipient organisation instant credibility. If not for his reputation, it is highly unlikely that stars such as Giteau, Nathan Sharpe, Drew Mitchell, Brendan Cannon and Cameron Shepherd would have been willing to take the risk of moving west. After all, with livelihoods and Wallabies’ caps on the line, exchanging the financial and sporting security that comes with being at an established franchise for the uncertainty that comes with joining a new operation was a gamble. Would the Western Force go the way of the Western Reds? Would they be a rabble on the field? Would they have proper facilities off the field? A man of Mitchell’s reputation was able to offer reassurance in a way that an anonymous appointee would not have been.

That, though, was four years ago. The requirements of 2009 and not the same as those of 2005. Back then, the task confronting the powerbrokers at the Force was to ensure that a seed was planted- and thanks in no small part to Mitchell, it was. Today, however, with the seed having grown into a sapling, the task is now to ensure that it continues to blossom, rather than wither and die. And the way to do that is to turn the club into genuine contenders.

Despite his experience and competence, one key fact immediately makes Mitchell unqualified for this mission: he has lost the dressing room. Although whispers about his uneasy relationship with his charges had been heard for some time, the situation was just about manageable while everything remained unofficial. But when, during the off-season, 30 players and 10 staff members filed a petition with management complaining about his behaviour, Mitchell’s position became untenable. Things only became worse when an internal review upheld the complaints, resulting in the New Zealander being forced to confess to his sins and surrender some of his power. The moment the subordinates are shown to have the whip hand, the boss’s authority is fatally undermined. While respect can be won and lost in innumerable ways, nobody will follow you unless they respect you. Clearly, Mitchell has lost the respect of his players. Clearly, they are not interested in playing for him. Clearly, he has to go.

Yet if all of that is so clear, why is Mitchell still in charge? The answer can only be money. Given that he is contracted for another three seasons, the Force have presumably concluded that it would be too expensive to pay him out. Perhaps they were hoping that if they humiliated him enough, he would resign and walk away for nothing, or at least a substantially reduced settlement. Whatever the reason, the club now finds itself being represented by a lame duck, who is surely going to struggle to find quality replacements for Giteau and any of the other 20 or so players who choose to leave when their contracts expire at season’s end. With the John Mitchell of 2005, the only way seemed to be up; with the John Mitchell of 2009, the only way seems to be down.

That is of grave concern, because allowing the sapling to wither and die would deliver a serious blow to a sport that is struggling to balance its books and compete with the other three footballing codes. Australian rugby severely limits itself if it is unwilling or unable to expand its base beyond the eastern seaboard. Take away the Force and you lose the opportunity to regularly preach to Perth’s 1.5 million inhabitants. Take away the Force and you have less people competing for Wallabies’ selection. And these two points are linked, because a successful and attractive national team is the best way to win convert new fans. Australian rugby needs the Force to not only survive, but thrive.

Mitchell therefore needs to be sacked. While he remains in charge, there is a serious risk that the club’s best players will follow Giteau out the door, and that crowd numbers and public interest will decline even more sharply than over the previous couple of seasons. Whether or not he is a good coach is irrelevant; whether or not he is to blame for the internecine feuding is irrelevant. The only thing relevant is this chain of logic: having a lame duck as coach can only result in declining fortunes for the club, and declining fortunes for the club can only result in defining fortunes for the national game. The Waratahs, Reds and Brumbies would be able to cope with such internal strife, because they would be insulated by the traditions and foundations they have built up over the years. But for the Western Force, the situation is markedly different. In only their fourth season, they don’t have much of a past. As things currently stand, they don’t have much of a future either.
109
Vote
   


In praise of the Bledisloe

November 4th 2008 11:01
The Wallabies in Hong Kong
Last Saturday, the Wallabies and All Blacks took part in an historic encounter in Hong Kong. It was an occasion worthy of both celebration and damnation.

On the negative side, although the match may have been an official part of this year’s Bledisloe series, in reality it was nothing more than a revenue-raising exercise. Given that no less than three tests had already been played between the two countries in Australia and New Zealand, there was no valid sporting reason to stage a fourth- and in Honkers of all places


[ Click here to read more ]
71
Vote
   


Nicky Carle
Let us declare it official: Nicky Carle is the Peter Hewat of Australian football.

In May 2007, Hewat was famously omitted from a 59 man training squad that then-Wallabies coach John Connolly assembled prior to the World Cup. Now, Carle has been omitted from a 35 man squad that Socceroos coach Pim Verbeek has assembled prior to the qualifier against Qatar


[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


Meet the new Lion King

September 3rd 2008 12:30
Brisbane Lions' new coach
Rugby fans: imagine, if you will, the following scenario.

With the Tri Nations delicately poised, and with the Bledisloe Cup on the line, the Australian Rugby Union decides to take a gamble, dumping Robbie Deans and replacing him with Tim Horan for the upcoming test match against New Zealand


[ Click here to read more ]
70
Vote
   


The more one sees of Graham Arnold, the less there is to like. To the unhappy list of misguided tactics, poor management and thoughtless statements can now be added breathtakingly illogical selections.

Arnold, who serves as both an assistant to Socceroos’ coach Pim Verbeek and Olympic team boss, has just announced his 18 man squad for Beijing. Oddly, although he managed to find room for Nikita Rukavytsya and Billy Celeski, he could not accommodate the talented young duo of Bruce Djite and Nathan Burns, both of whom are full internationals. Further surprises came with the omission of David Williams and James Holland, who recently received their first senior caps. One might be tempted to believe that Arnie had lost his marbles, if not for the fact that he probably never had them in the first place


[ Click here to read more ]
61
Vote
   


Nick Bendel's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Nick Bendel
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]